8/5/2023 0 Comments Visual studio 2022 code review![]() ![]() When you then add additional reviewers (step E) they are receiving the code changes bundled together with your comments. The process of sending your completed comments to yourself (step D) in effect publishes or embeds your comments in the code review. However, unlike your intended reviewers, who will examine all your changes and raise questions, your job is to examine all your questions and supply answers: in other words, annotate the code to explain why significant changes were made. That is, the first thing you do is swap your developer hat for your reviewer hat. Send your completed comments- to yourself.Open the review, review each change, and add comments explaining what you did.There is no button or field or control for it it is simply a process, and a simple one at that: It is less obvious how to add the third type, pre-review comments, in TFS: It doesn’t seem natural, which is why it doesn’t occur to the developer to use them. You already know how to add two of these types, in-code comments and a code-review description. When creating a code review, specified along with the reviewersĮxplain non-obvious changes from the prior version to the current version.Īfter creating a code review but before sending to reviewers Single, general comment attached to a code review when you create it. In-code comments are excellent for explaining what is but the final type of comment-what I call pre-review comments-explain what changed, which is arguably the most critical aspect of a code review.Īnnotate existing code to explain obscure or tricky code. These in-code comments are, again, certainly very useful, but still insufficient. ‘Just put some comments in the code for anything that might be tricky or obscure’. However, that code review description is not sufficient for an effective review: you need to be able to point out specifics as well: ‘But that is easy’, you counter. It should be broad in scope, but brief and to the point setting the tone for everything that is to follow. You are limited in what you could, or should, put in a general, global comment attached to your code review. ![]() In this c ode- review description, you can type as much as you want, and it is certainly useful to give a high-level context to your changes. With the TFS code review tool, you select the set of files that you would like to have reviewed: You select your reviewers, you specify a subject, and you then add a single, global description that provides any notes you wish to convey to your reviewers. Once you can apply them, you can get reviewers of your code to do more with less effort! I’ll be using TFS as an example, but the general principles that I describe will apply to whatever code review tool you use, or computer language you’re coding in. The techniques that I’ll describe are simple, easy to learn and easy to apply: They are just not very obvious-until you know them. This article explains how to use a code review tool to get more and better feedback from reviewers, while making their job easier and less tiresome. However, most people do not use a code review tool the right way, because the wrong way seems more “natural”. One very effective way to improve your code quality is to have your code reviewed by your teammates using a code review tool, which can help you to integrate the task into your development process. You can build a piece of barely adequate code, or you can build a robust, extensible, performant piece of code. The word “right” implies that it is an absolute state, whereas it is really a matter of degree. The editor helps you get the syntax right the compiler helps you get the references right unit tests help you get the logic right, and so forth. It is challenging to create good software, but there are many tools that you use every day to help you do the job. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |